Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 385)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Willingness to pay for electricity-driven passenger vehicles
Název práce v češtině: Willingness to pay for electricity-driven passenger vehicles
Název v anglickém jazyce: Willingness to pay for electricity-driven passenger vehicles
Klíčová slova: ochota platiť; výberový experiment; vyjdrené preferencie; spotrebiteľské preferencie; vozidlá na alternatívny pohon; elektromobilita
Klíčová slova anglicky: willingness to pay; discrete choice experiments; stated preferences; consumer preferences; alternative fuel vehicles; electromobility
Akademický rok vypsání: 2016/2017
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: angličtina
Ústav: Institut ekonomických studií (23-IES)
Vedoucí / školitel: Mgr. Milan Ščasný, Ph.D.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
Datum přihlášení: 09.11.2016
Datum zadání: 09.11.2016
Datum a čas obhajoby: 21.06.2017 08:30
Místo konání obhajoby: Opletalova - Opletalova 26, O206, Opletalova - místn. č. 206
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:18.05.2017
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 21.06.2017
Oponenti: PhDr. Jiří Kukačka, Ph.D.
 
 
 
Kontrola URKUND:
Seznam odborné literatury
Alberini, A., Longo, A., Veronesi, M. (2007). Basic statistical models for stated choice studies. In: Kanninen,B.J. (Ed.), Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies – A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht, 203-227.
Boxall, P. C., Adamowicz, W. L. (2002). Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental and resource economics, 23(4), 421-446.
Bujosa, A., Riera, A., Hicks, R. L. (2010). Combining discrete and continuous representations of preference heterogeneity: a latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47(4), 477-493.
Carson, R.T., Louviere, J.J. (2011). A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches. Environmental and Resource Economics, 49(4), 539-559.
Directive 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure. (2014). O. J. L 307/1.
European Automobile Manufacturers Association.(n.d.). New Passenger Car Registrations by Alternative Fuel Type in The European Union. Retrieved from http://www.acea.be/uploads/press_releases_files/ AFV_registrations_Q4_2015_FINAL.PDF
Greene, W. H., Hensher, D. A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(8), 681-698.
Hackbarth, A., Madlener, R. (2016). Willingness-to-pay for alternative fuel vehicle characteristics: A stated choice study for Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 89-111.
Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), 332-341.
Hanley, N., Mourato, S., Wright, R. E. (2001). Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 435–462.
Hausman, J., McFadden, D. L. (1984). Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1219-1240.
Hess, S., Ben-Akiva, M., Gopinath, D., Walker, J. (2011). Advantages of Latent Class Over Continuous Mixture of Logit Models. ITS Working paper, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds.
McFadden, D. L. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press.
Ministerstvo průmyslu a obchodu ČR. (2015). Národní akční plán čisté mobility. Praha: MPO.
Swait, J. (2007). Advanced choice models. In: Kanninen,B.J. (Ed.), Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies – A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht, 229-293.
Ščasný, M., Zvěřinová, I, Czajkowski, M. (2015). Individual preference for the alternative fuel vehicles and their attributes in Poland. Submitted to EcoMod2015, Boston College, July 15-17, 2015.
Předběžná náplň práce
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Literature review:
Main results from the recent literature on willingness to pay estimates for clean-fueled vehicles.
3. Methodology:
Description of stated preference methods, their theoretical model - randon utility model - and estimation methods – conditional logit, mixed logit, and latent class model.
4. Survey and data:
Presentation of the experimental design of the study and summary statistics of the gathered data.
5. Results:
Estimation results and description of the main findings.
6. Conclusion:
Summary of the main findings and their implications.
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Literature review:
Main results from the recent literature on willingness to pay estimates for clean-fueled vehicles.
3. Methodology:
Description of stated preference methods, their theoretical model - randon utility model - and estimation methods – conditional logit, mixed logit, and latent class model.
4. Survey and data:
Presentation of the experimental design of the study and summary statistics of the gathered data.
5. Results:
Estimation results and description of the main findings.
6. Conclusion:
Summary of the main findings and their implications.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK