Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 368)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Prezidentský systém v Brazílii
Název práce v češtině: Prezidentský systém v Brazílii
Název v anglickém jazyce: Presidential System in Brazil
Klíčová slova: prezidentské systémy, koaliční prezidencialismus, politické instituce, prezidentské zhroucení, Brazílie 1985–
Klíčová slova anglicky: presidential systems, coalitional presidentialism, political institutions, presidential breakdown, Brazil 1985–
Akademický rok vypsání: 2010/2011
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: čeština
Ústav: Ústav politologie (21-UPOL)
Vedoucí / školitel: PhDr. Radek Buben, Ph.D.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno a potvrzeno stud. odd.
Datum přihlášení: 09.01.2011
Datum zadání: 09.01.2011
Schválení administrátorem: zatím neschvalováno
Datum potvrzení stud. oddělením: 20.12.2012
Datum a čas obhajoby: 31.01.2013 11:00
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:20.12.2012
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 31.01.2013
Odevzdaná/finalizovaná: odevzdaná studentem a finalizovaná
Oponenti: Mgr. Jiří Koubek, Ph.D.
 
 
 
Zásady pro vypracování
V politologické literatuře je Brazílie odsouzena k nezdaru - kombinuje prezidenta s velmi silnými legislatvními pravomocemi a značně fragmentovaný parlament. Navzdory všemu Brazílie vykazuje značnou stabilitu. Autor se snaží zachytit momenty, které k této stabilitě vedly. Zaměřuje se na schopnost parlamentu být prezidentovi (re)aktivním protihráčem v legislativní politice a vetohráčem v otázce setrvání prezidenta v úřadu - podobně i prezidentova strategie vůči parlamentu ovlivňuje úspěšnost jeho politiky, ale také jeho případné přežití ve funkci. Vhodným indikátorem prezidentovi strategie je kombinace míry sestavování koaličních vlád a využívání prezidentských dekretů.
Seznam odborné literatury
Ames, Barry (2002).„Party Discipline in the Chamber of Deputies“ in: Legislative Politics in Latin America, Morgenstern, Scott, Nacif, Benito (eds.), 185-221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Amorim Neto, Octavio (2006).Presidencialismo e governabilidade nas Américas. Rio de Janeiro: EDITORA FGV.
Amorim Neto, Octavio, Tafner, Paulo (2002). „Governos de Coalizão e Mecanismos de Alarme de Incêndio no Controle Legislativo das Medidas Provisórias“ in: DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais 45(1): 5-38.
Bethell, Leslie, Nicolau, Jairo (2008).„Politics in Brazil, 1985-2002“ in: The Cambridge History of Latin America, Volume IX: Brazil since 1930, Bethell, Leslie (ed.), 231-279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Braga, Maria do Socorro S. (2010).„Eleições e democracia no Brasil: a caminho de partidos e sistema partidário institucionalizados“ in: Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política 4: 43-73.
Carey, John M., Shugart, Matthew S. (1998).„Caling Out the Tanks or Filling Out the Forms?“ in: Executive Decree Authority, Carey, John M., Shugart, Matthew S. (eds.), 1-32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheibub, José Antonio (2007).Presidentialism, Parlamentarism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Colomer, Josep M., Negretto, Gabriel L. (2005).„Can Presidentialism Work as Parliamentarism“ in: Government and Opposition 40(1): 60-89.
Costa, Ivanete de Araújo (2007).Conexão eleitoral: A reeleição na Câmara dos Deputados e o perfil político dos parlamentares com oito oum mais mandatos consecutivos. [on-line] 5. prosince 2012 Dostupné z http://bd.camara.leg.br/bd/bitstream/handle/bdcamara/2081/conexao_eleitoral_araujo.pdf
Cox, Garry, Morgenstern, Scott (2002).„Epilogue: Latin America’s Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents“ in: Legislative Politics in Latin America, Morgenstern, Scott, Nacif, Benito (eds.), 446-469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Figueiredo, Argelina C. (2007).„Government Coalitions in Brazilian Democracy“ in: Brazilian Political Science Review 1(2): 182-216.
Figueiredo, Argelina C. (2010).„The Collor Impeachment and Presidential Government in Brazil“in: Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America Causes and Outcomes of Executive Instability in Developing Democracies, Llanos, Mariana, Marsteintredet, Leiv (eds.), 111-128. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Figueiredo, Argelina C., Limongi, Fernando (2000).„Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil“ in: Comparative Politics 32(2): 151-170.
Figueiredo, Argelina C., Limongi, Fernando (2006).„Poder de agenda na democracia brasileira: desempenho do governo no presidencialismo pluripartidário“ in: Reforma Política: Lições Da História Recente, Soares, Gláucio Ary Dillon, Rennó, Lucio R. (eds.), 249-280. Rio de Janeiro: EDITORA FGV.
Helms, Ludger (2005).„Studying Executive Leadership“ in: Presidents, Prime Ministers and Chancellors: Executive Leadership in Western Democracies, 3-23. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hochstetler, Kathryn (2006).„Rethinking Presidentialism: Challenges and Presidential Falls in South America“ in: Comparative Politics 38(4): 401-418.
Hochstetler, Kathryn (2009).„Failed Presidencies: Identifying and Explaining South American Anomaly“ in: Journal of Politics n Latin America 1(2): 31-57.
Horowitz, Donald L. (1990). „Comparing Democratic Systems“ in: Journal of Democracy 1(4): 73-79.
Lamounier, Bolívar, Amorim Neto, Octavio (2005).„Brazil“ in: Elections in the Americas: Volume II: South America, Nohlen, Dieter (ed.), 163-252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend (1992).„Introduction“ in: Parliamentary versus Presidential Government, Lijphart, Arend (ed.), 1-27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Limongi, Fernando, Figueiredo, Argelina (2006).„The Budget Process and Legislative Behavior: Individual Amendments, Support for the Executive, and Government“ in: DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais Selected Edition(2): [on-line] 30. listopadu 2012. Dostupné z: http://socialsciences.scielo.org/pdf/s_dados/v2nse/scs_a02.pdf
Linz, Juan J. (1994).„Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Diference?“ in: The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Linz, Juan J., Valenzuela, Arturo (eds.), 3-87. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Linz, Juan J. (1990a).„The Perils of Presidentialism“ in: Journal of Democracy 1(1): 51-59.
Linz, Juan J. (1990b).„The Virtues of Parliamentarism“ in: Journal of Democracy 1(4): 84-91.
Mainwaring, Scott P. (1995).„Brazil: Weak Parties, Feckless Democracy“ in: Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, Mainwaring, Scott P, Scully, Timothy R. (eds.), 354-398. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott P. (1997).„Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil“ in: Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, Mainwaring, Scott, Shugart, Matthew S. (eds), 55-109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott, Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal (2005).„Latin American Democratization since 1978: Democratic Transitions, Breakdowns, and Erosions“ in: The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, Mainwairng, Scott, Hagopian, Frances (eds.), 14-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott, Scully, Timothy R. (1995).„Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America“ in: Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, Mainwaring, Scott, Scully, Timothy R. (eds.), 1-34. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott, Shugart, Matthew S. (1997).„Conclusion: Presidentialism and the Party System“ in: Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, Mainwaring, Scott, Shugart, Matthew S. (eds), 394-439. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marsteintredet, Leiv, Berntzen, Einar (2008). „Reducing the Perils of Presidentialism in Latin America through Presidential Interruptions“ in: Comparative Politics 41(1): 83-101.
Melo, Carlos Ranulfo (2006).„Sistema partidário, presidencialismo e reforma política no Brasil“ in: Reforma Política: Lições Da História Recente, Soares, Gláucio Ary Dillon, Rennó, Lucio R. (eds.), 157-173. Rio de Janeiro: EDITORA FGV.
Morgenstern, Scott (2002).„Explaining Legislative Politics in Latin America“ in: Legislative Politics in Latin America, Morgenstern, Scott, Nacif, Benito (eds.), 413-445. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morgenstern, Scott, Negri Juan J., Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal (2008).„Parliamentary Opposition in Non-Parliamentary Regimes: Latin America“ in: Journal of Legislative Studies 14(1,2): 160-189.
Mustapic, Ana María (2010).„Presidentialism and Early Exists: The Role of Congress“ in: Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America: Causes and Outcomes of Executive Instability in Developing Democracies, Llanos, Mariana, Marsteintredet, Leiv (eds.), 17-32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Negretto, Gabriel L. (2004).„Government Capacities and Policy Making by Decree in Latin America: The Cases of Brazil and Argentina“ in: Comparative Political Studies 37(5): 531-562.
Nicolau, Jairo (2006).„Voto personalizado e reforma eleitoral no Brasil“ in: Reforma Política: Lições Da História Recente, Soares, Gláucio Ary Dillon, Rennó, Lucio R. (eds.), 23-33. Rio de Janeiro: EDITORA FGV.
O’Donell, Guillermo A. (1994).„Delegative Democracy“ in: Journal of Democracy 5(1): 55-69.
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal (2005).„Democratization and Constitutional Crises: Toward Congressional Supremacy?“ in: Comparative Political Studies 38(1): 51-74.
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal (2007).Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Power, Timothy, J. (1998).„The Pen Is Mightier Than Congress: Presidential Decree Power in Brazil“ in: Executive Decree Authority, Carey, John M., Shugart, Matthew S. (eds.), 197-230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dos Santos, André Marenco (2006).„Regras eleitorais, deputados e fedilidade partidária“ in: Reforma Política: Lições Da História Recente, Soares, Gláucio Ary Dillon, Rennó, Lucio R. (eds.), 176-192. Rio de Janeiro: EDITORA FGV.
Santos, Fabiano (2003).„Em Defesa do Presidencialismo de Coalizão“ in: Reforma Política no Brasil – Realizações e Perspectivas, Hermanns, Klaus, Moraes, Filomeno (eds.), 19-28. Fortaleza: Fundação Konrad Adenauer.
Sartori, Giovanni (2001).Srovnávací ústavní inženýrství: zkoumání struktur, podnětů a výsledků. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
Shugart, Matthew S., Carey, John M. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shugart, Matthew S., Mainwaring, Scott (1997).„Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America: Rethinking the Terms of the Debate“ in: Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, Mainwaring, Scott, Shugart, Matthew S. (eds), 12-54. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tsebelis, George (1995).„Decision Making in Political Systems: Decision Making in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism“ in: British Journal of Political Science 25(3): 289-325.
Von Mettenheim, Kurt (1997).„Presidential Institutions and Democratic Politics“ in: Presidential Institutions and Democratic Politics: Comparing Regional and National Contexts, Von Mettenheim, Kurt (ed.), 1-15. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK