PředmětyPředměty(verze: 945)
Předmět, akademický rok 2023/2024
   Přihlásit přes CAS
The Pragmatic Turn in Phenomenology - AFSV00345
Anglický název: The Pragmatic Turn in Phenomenology
Zajišťuje: Ústav filosofie a religionistiky (21-UFAR)
Fakulta: Filozofická fakulta
Platnost: od 2021
Semestr: zimní
Body: 0
E-Kredity: 5
Způsob provedení zkoušky: zimní s.:
Rozsah, examinace: zimní s.:2/0, Zk [HT]
Počet míst: neurčen / neurčen (15)
Minimální obsazenost: neomezen
4EU+: ne
Virtuální mobilita / počet míst pro virtuální mobilitu: ne
Kompetence:  
Stav předmětu: nevyučován
Jazyk výuky: angličtina
Způsob výuky: prezenční
Způsob výuky: prezenční
Úroveň:  
Další informace: https://dl1.cuni.cz/course/view.php?id=4329
Poznámka: předmět je možno zapsat mimo plán
povolen pro zápis po webu
Garant: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D.
Mgr. Daniil Koloskov, Ph.D.
Třída: Exchange - 08.1 Philosophy
Rozvrh   Nástěnka   
Anotace
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (25.09.2020)
The aim of this course is to extract and assess the pragmatic theses that are present in the phenomenological works of M. Heidegger, M. Merleau-Ponty and J. Patočka. We will read and critically assess both primary texts and several pragmatic readings of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, while focusing on the following themes as possible justifications for speaking about the pragmatic turn in phenomenology:
- the primacy of the practical over theoretical understanding
- criticism of the representationalist account of perception
- analysis of truth claims within the context of social and cultural practices

This course is oriented towards students in philosophy (both Czech and Erasmus).
Podmínky zakončení předmětu
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (12.09.2020)

The credits for the course will be delivered based on two categories of assessment:

(1) Engaged Involvement:

This is generally a matter of preparation, attendance, attention, and participation in the course.

and:

(2a) Oral presentation with critical assessment of two issues:

·        Is the interpretation accurate to the position reported?

·        Is it an accurate analysis of the philosophical problems at stake?

or:

(2b) Written Work:

A paper based on critical assessment of already exiting interpretations of Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty or Patočka with regards to the primary texts. This means: You must consult primary sources, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and compare or critically assess different interpretations.

Topics for the papers are to be chosen by yourself, but of course it can be in consultation with me. The topic must clearly deal with themes raised during our course.

These papers should be of roughly 6-7 pages (250*7=1750 words) and should be sent to my email address with a proper form of footnotes, endnotes, or references (in .doc, .docx, .rtf or .odt format). The papers will be due on Friday, 15 January 2021.

Literatura
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (12.09.2020)

Brandom, Robert (2002a) “Heidegger’s Categories in Sein und Zeit.” In Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 298-323.

Brandom, Robert (2002b) “Dasein, the Being that Thematizes” In Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 324-347.

Crowell, Steven (2013) Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, Cambridge University Press

Dreyfus, Hubert (1991) Being-in-the-World, Commentary on Heidegger's "Being and Time," Division I., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Faulconer, James E . & Wrathall, Mark, eds. (2000) Appropriating Heidegger, Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

Haugeland, John (2013) Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger, ed. by Joseph Rouse, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Heidegger, Martin (1996) Being and Time (translated by Joan Stambaugh). Albany: State University of New York Press

Husserl, H. (1970), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, (trans. D. Carr) Evanston: Northwestern University Press

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1997), Phénoménologie de la perception, Éditions Gallimard.

Okrent, Mark (1988) Heidegger's Pragmatism: Understanding, Being, and the Critique of Metaphysics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Patočka, Jan (1996) Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing.

Patočka, Jan (1998) Body, Community, Language, World, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing.

Jan Patočka, Jan (2016) Afterword to the first French Translation in Jan Patočka, The Natural World as a Philosophical Problem, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Rorty, Richard (1991) Heidegger, contingency, and pragmatism. In: R. Rorty, Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers Volume 2 (pp. 27–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Švec, Ondřej & Čapek, Jakub (eds.) Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology, Routledge, London/New York 2017

Metody výuky - angličtina
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (25.09.2020)

This class will meet every Tuesday from 10:50 to 12:30 using Zoom. It will be important for you to be able to attend each Zoom session, just as it would to attend class in a physical classroom.

You can join the Zoom session on the regular address https://cesnet.zoom.us/j/3155947670 10 minutes prior to class starting.

In order to facilitate better class engagement with both teachers and with your fellow classmates during these Zoom sessions, you will be asked to have your webcams on throughout the duration of class.

These Zoom sessions will not be recorded.

IMPORTANT ON FIRST DAY OF CLASS - All enrolled students are asked to be present in the first Zoom class session on Tuesday, October 6 from 10:50 to 12:30.

Sylabus
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (12.09.2020)

1 General Introduction: Primacy of Practice in Phenomenology     

2 Things themselves as pragmata - Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, §13, 15 and 16

3 The criticism of the representationalist account of intentionality - Hubert Dreyfus, Being-in-the-World, chap. 4 "Availableness and Occurrentness", p. 60-87

4 Ruled by the Average - The positive and negative dimensions of our Being-with-others - Hubert Dreyfus, Being-in-the-World, chap. 8 “The Who of Everyday Dasein”, p. 141-162

5 Overcoming the Average Expertise vs. everyday intelligibility - Hubert  Dreyfus,“Could anything be more intelligible than everyday intelligibility?“ in: Appropriating Heidegger, p.155-74

6 Heidegger and American Pragmatism - William Blattner, "What Heidegger and Dewey Could Learn From Each Other.” Philosophical Topics 36 no. 1 (2008): 57–77.

7 Karel Kosík´s critical assessement of Heidegger´s analysis of preoccupation - The primacy of practice as the common grand scheme in both Heidegger and marxism - Karel Kosík - Dialectics of the Concrete - chap. II

8 Absorded coping vs. Conceptual Thinking in Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty - Merleau-Ponty - Phenomenology of Perception – chap. „The spatiality of my own body“

9 Merleau-Ponty´s insights into the pragmatic dimensions of language, perception and intersubjectivity - Hubert Dreyfus - "A Merleau-Pontyian Critique of Representationalist Accounts of Action"

10 Situated Acting and Absorbed Coping - Komarine Romdenh-Romluc - "Thought in Action"

11 The Primacy of Practice in Jan Patočka´s Phenomenology - Jan Patočka, "Afterword to the first French Translation in The Natural World as a Philosophical Problem", Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2016.

 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK