|
|
|
||
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (27.02.2017)
- the primacy of the practical over theoretical understanding - criticism of the representationalist account of perception - analysis of truth claims within the context of social and cultural practices. |
|
||
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (27.02.2017)
Brandom, Robert. 2002a. “Heidegger’s Categories in Sein und Zeit.” In Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 298-323. Brandom, Robert. 2002b. “Dasein, the Being that Thematizes” In Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 324-347. Crowell, Steven (2013), Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, Cambridge University Press Dreyfus, Hubert (1991), Being-in-the-World, Commentary on Heidegger's "Being and Time," Division I., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Haugeland, John (2013), Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger, ed. by Joseph Rouse, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Heidegger, Martin (1996), Being and Time (translated by Joan Stambaugh). Albany: State University of New York Press Husserl, H. (1970), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, (trans. D. Carr) Evanston: Northwestern University Press Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1997), Phénoménologie de la perception, Éditions Gallimard. Okrent, Mark (1988) Heidegger's Pragmatism: Understanding, Being, and the Critique of Metaphysics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Patočka, Jan (1996) Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing. Patočka, Jan (1998) Body, Community, Language, World, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing. Rorty, Richard (1991) Heidegger, contingency, and pragmatism. In: R. Rorty, Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers Volume 2 (pp. 27–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
|
||
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (27.02.2017)
The credits for the course will be delivered based on two categories of assessment: (1) Engaged Involvement: This is generally a matter of preparation, attendance, attention, and participation in the course. and: (2a) Oral presentation with critical assessment of two issues: · Is the interpretation accurate to the position reported? · Is it an accurate analysis of the philosophical problems at stake? or: (2b) Written Work: A paper, based on critical assessment of already exiting interpretations of Heidegger or Merleau-Ponty with regards to the primary texts. These papers should be of roughly 6-7 pages (250*7=1750 words) and should be sent to my email address with a proper form of footnotes, endnotes, or references. The papers will be due on Friday, 15 June 2017. |